The Moral Issues Of The Animal Testing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

The Moral Issues Of The Animal Testing - Essay ExampleThe debates stemming from carnal rights are one of the major issues existence discussed in medical symposiums and environmentalists. In my opinion, animal interrogatory is non justified. Animal testing is not only morally wrong, but also the results of the experiments are not 100 percent accurate. It has been estimated that over 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals are used in experiments and trials the imagine of animals used in testing is even greater. The animals that have not been weaned and invertebrates are not include in the aforementioned figure. A major fraction of the animals that have been tested upon is killed. Although many of the researchers are being conducted on the safety of animals, it is not justified to use animals for the purpose of human safety. It is not off glisten to know more about animals and to study them in more detail like there is zilch wrong in furthering our research about planetary bodies . However, it needs to be noted that the researchers being make on animals can be misleading. It is with experience and researches conducted in the past that have made us witness that some drugs may fail to elicit the same response as they did in animals. It is much(prenominal) failed researchers that attest to the fact that animals are different from humans. Using rats for cancer research was one such example where excruciate animals were the sake of human good was pointless (Pakistan Politics Journal). Scientists had resorted to rats as test subjects until 1993 when it was reported that the genetic organic law of the rats renders them vulnerable to cancer, and so research on them ca never yield accurate results.Cohen adheres to the view that animals are not like humans and this is why he believes that they can be used for animal testing (94). Right is fundamentally a claim that one individual asserts over the other. A right encompasses the elements such as who holds the righ t and to whom it is against.