Planck V. Indiana :: essays research papers

Planck v. indium     In the reviewing the shimmy of Planck v. atomic number 49, m whatsoever complicated issuesarise. Included in those, individual rights conflicting with the populace goodare among the most difficult. According to Mr and Mrs. Plancks attorney, JohnPrice, the Plancks religious beliefs abrogate them from accepting professionalmedicament approach pattern, as they practice alternative medicine and home school theirchildren. After a complaint from an older Planck daughter, who did not embraceor respect her familys lifestyle, the state was called in to investigate thewellness of the Planck children. In a preliminary check by the state of Indianafor eyeight, Lance Planck was found not to be in need of any service. Despitethis finding, the Madison County Superior Court request that all of the Planckschildrens eyes be examined by the state. One month after the Court orderedthis, twenty armed police officers with guns drawn came to the Plancks res idence andcommanded Mr. and Mrs. Planck to give up their children. Mr. Planck told theofficers that he did not know why they were there, was pushed to the ground andhad loaded rifles pointed at him. The children were indeed forcibly removed fromtheir parents custody, and at no time was any assignment shown by theofficers. Curt, Lance Plancks younger brother, resisted this removal from hishouse, and was threatened by an officer that he would be "dragged out of here."After this scene, Emily, Stephen, and Curtis Planck were loaded into a avant-garde anddriven to an eye doctor in Anderson, Indiana. The examining doctor, Dr. JosephWoschitz, came to the conclusion that no treatment was needed for any of thechildren. How can the state justify this type of sort? Is ripping a childunwillingly from his mothers arms in the beat out interest of the public good?What does society have to benefit from this? In short, this does not affect thepublic good per se, but does affect the Pla ncks and any other family thatpractices a religion that is not widely accepted.     Following the in a higher place events, Mr. and Mrs. Planck were subsequentlyarrested, had their First Amendment rights violated, and had their home invadedby armed SWAT team up members who fired a CS tear gas canister into their house.Simply, Mr. and Mrs. Planck and their children were targeted by the stateselectively because of their religious beliefs which they manifested in homeeducation and the practice of alternative medicine. The fundamental argumenthere is that the Plancks rights have been violated, and the State of Indianahas overstepped its duty of caring for the Plancks children.